Stakpak Vs Coding Agents

Overview

While coding agents are impressive at writing code, they often struggle in DevOps/Ops work, Stakpak was designed from the ground up for DevOps & Operations.

Why We Built Stakpak?

We want infrastructure to be autonomous and self-driving. So we as engineers could focus on what matters the most (and what we enjoy the most) coding... building things.

As illustrated bellow, a Stakpak user today will spend most of their session time on non-coding related tasks. Now imagine most (if not all) of that going away!

We're building an intelligence you can rely on to take away the DevOps pains in your workflow, so you could spend more time coding.

This is in contrast to coding agents, MCP tools, and models which try maximize the number of lines of code you ship every day.

What Makes Stakpak Different?

First, let's dig into the difference between Coding Tasks and DevOps Tasks:

Coding Tasks

DevOps Tasks

Feedback loop

fast

slow

Users’ knowledge

high

< 3% of devs do this full-time*

Syntax/Language

few popular

many domain specific

Frequency of schema/knowledge change

low

high

Context

mostly local

mostly remote

*Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024

Coding tasks and DevOps tasks are different. Coding tasks involve fast feedback loops, widely adopted languages, and the fact that most developers already are quite experienced in the language they're using. In contrast, DevOps tasks often take longer to get feedback, involve remote systems, and require handling many domain-specific languages, and tools. Only a small fraction of people work on these tasks full-time, and the landscape changes frequently as tools and APIs evolve. These differences make DevOps tasks more complex, less predictable, and harder to support with LLM tools originally designed for coding.

Rule Books: Organizational Intelligence

Rule Books are how you teach Stakpak agents to follow your way of doing things. Think of them as markdown-based SOPs (standard operating procedures), whether it’s how to deploy to production, upgrade infrastructure, or tag resources correctly. Stakpak uses Rule Books to make decisions that align with your team’s standards, not just generic best practices.

Why does it matter?

Coding agents follow generic best practices. Stakpak follows your practices.

Coding Agents

  • Generic advice like "follow best practices for deployment," but getting your entire organization to actually follow the same procedures is nearly impossible without org-wide shared rules

Stakpak:

  • Executes your exact procedure step-by-step, accounting for variations that happen in real-life ops

Memory Blocks: Persistent Operational Knowledge

Memory Blocks are reusable pieces of knowledge that your agent learns during sessions.

As you interact with the agent, it automatically extracts useful information like commands, configs, environment details, or error fixes and stores them as memory blocks for future use.

Why does it matter?

Because operational knowledge shouldn’t disappear after a session. Every command, fix, or config you share becomes part of a growing knowledge base that’s always available. Over time, the agent understands your environment better, responds with more context, and helps you solve problems faster without repeating yourself.

Coding Agents

  • Knowledge isn't shared across team members, and generic memory systems can't extract infrastructure-specific patterns

Stakpak:

  • Builds organizational knowledge over time with /memorize command

Shell Mode: Interactive Operations

Shell Mode is Stakpak’s built-in terminal designed to handle interactive shell commands that require real-time user input, such as password prompts or confirmations. It allows you to run commands that pause for user decisions or credentials.

Why does it matter?

Many operational tasks need interactive prompts

Coding Agents

  • Can only suggest commands, can't execute interactive ones

Stakpak:

  • Executes interactive commands with secure credential handling

Async Background Tasks: Non-Blocking Operations

Stakpak supports async background tasks so your agent can run long operations like provisioning infrastructure or port-forwarding into Kubernetes clusters without blocking your workflow.

These tasks execute in parallel, allowing the agent to stay responsive and handle multiple requests at once.

Why does it matter?

Infrastructure operations often take minutes or hours

Coding Agents

  • One response at a time, no background execution, port-forwarding on watching logs stall the main thread

Stakpak:

  • Runs multiple long-running tasks in parallel with a non-blocking task manager

Agent Sessions: Operational Audit Trail

Review and audit your past agent sessions to understand exactly what your agent did and why.

Each session includes:

  • Full conversation history

  • Key checkpoints and decisions

  • Actions taken and their results

Why does it matter?

Easier debugging and operational transparency

Coding Agents

  • Short-term chat history

Stakpak:

  • Transparent audit trail with shareable Agent Sessions

Warden: Production Guardrails

Warden acts as a deterministic policy enforcer for every agent action. It inspects, validates, and blocks any destructive or unauthorized operations before they reach your environment.

Why does it matter?

It prevents destructive operations in production environments

Coding Agents

  • They have basic command blacklisting but in DevOps and operations, agents run hundreds of tools and custom scripts. It's impossible to blacklist every destructive pattern across Terraform, kubectl, AWS CLI, Docker, and other custom automation

Stakpak:

  • Built-in safety net with stakpak warden , technology agnostic, and blocks all commands with API side-effects by default

Dynamic Secret Redaction: Production Safe Security

Stakpak agent can interact with secrets like API keys and tokens without ever seeing their actual values. Secrets are redacted at runtime and never exposed in logs or memory.

Why does it matter?

Protects sensitive data from exposure in logs and conversations

Coding Agents

  • It will accidentally expose secrets.

Stakpak:

  • Never sees or logs actual secret values as it supports the entire GitLeaks library, plus additional patterns it can safely redact, compare, and write 200+ secret types in real-time

Design Choices

Here are tradeoffs we make when building Stakpak to optimize for DevOps

  • Good generalist coder, but the BEST at DevOps Stakpak runs Claude Sonnet 4, so it's really good at generic coding task, this is needed for a variety of DevOps related tasks (debugging code, configuring secrets properly, or finding an entry point for containerization). However we optimize everything around the model for day-to-day DevOps tasks, for instance our context management allows the agent to handle long-horizon tasks spanning +100 steps without need for state compaction which reduces accuracy.

  • Usable security Handling secrets and sensitive data is inevitable in production. We developed the most secure file editing, and MCP tools implementation in any coding agent + state of the art deterministic guardrails specifically designed for DevOps. We put a lot of effort into making security transparent for developers.

  • Terminal native You should be able to drop into a Stakpak shell anywhere, support remote SSH operations natively.

  • Run in the user's environment Stakpak is designed to run in your own terminal, server, and CI/CD. This allows you to use the agent effectively without sharing your credentials. It operates within your existing SDLC.

  • Opinionated models Our R&D shows that optimizing for a specific LLM (or ensemble of them) takes time, giving users the ability to switch models without proper evaluation produces subpar performance. We have internal evaluations and optimization pipelines to make sure we're shipping the best ensemble of models + system prompts + Rule Books for a given task, and it all works out of the box.

TLDR

Choose Stakpak When You Need:

  • To run operations safely in live environments

  • Consistency and compliance by design

  • Long-running, asynchronous tasks without blocking

  • Organizational knowledge that grows over time

  • Transparent audit trails for debugging and accountability

  • Built-in security for secrets and production guardrails

Choose Coding Agents When You Need:

  • Help writing or explaining code

  • Quick answers to programming questions

  • Generating snippets, algorithms, or boilerplate

  • Learning new frameworks, libraries, or languages

Coding agents help you write code. Stakpak helps you run production operations.

Last updated